Claims

Chicago's district-wide Freshman On-Track rate improved from 61 percent in 2006 to 85 percent in 2015

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The district's On-Track rate rose from 61 percent in 2006 to 85 percent in 2015. → Pitcher 2016

Evidence

Pitcher 2016

Pitcher, M. A., Duncan, S. J., Nagaoka, J., Moeller, E., Dickerson, L., & Beechum, N. O. (2016). The Network for College Success: A Capacity-Building Model for School Improvement. University of Chicago. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/network-college-success-capacity-building-model-school-improvement

q2 · i? · design · r1

Descriptive trend reported in the Executive Summary and Introduction, illustrated in Figure 1. The paper reports the district On-Track rate "improved from 61 to 85 percent in 2015"; no effect size or inferential test is printed.

"Since 2006, the year NCS was founded, the district's On-Track rate has improved from 61 to 85 percent in 2015."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cps-on-track-rate-61-to-85-percent-2006-2015
title Chicago's district-wide Freshman On-Track rate improved from 61 percent in 2006 to 85 percent in 2015
description Chicago's district-wide Freshman On-Track rate improved from 61 percent in 2006 to 85 percent in 2015
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
source_checked 2026-10-20
recheck_by 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pitcher-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.