Peer Feedback¶
Element · All elements
Evidence · 6 claims (6 for) · 5 studies (3 quant-synthesis, 2 causal),q3–q4· 3 of 5 report an effect size · 6 claims rest on one study
Description¶
Peer feedback is the element in which learners respond to one another's work with comments intended to improve revision or performance.
Affordances¶
Claims¶
- Peer Feedback Improves Writing [+M]
- Peer assessment improves academic performance by a small average amount relative to no assessment or to teacher assessment [+M]
- A feedback provision scaffold of prompts plus a sample solution significantly improves the quality of feedback messages pre-service teachers provide on peers' case analyses [+W] — attached 2026-10-18 from Julia Hornstein et al. (2025), which proposed "Feedback provision scaffold: three feed-up/feed-back/feed-forward prompts with a sample solution".
- Feedback provision support improves quality of feedback provision (g = 0.72) and quality of feedback reception (g = 0.69) but not subject-matter-related knowledge [+W]
- Instructional support improves quality of feedback provision (g = 0.64) and quality of feedback reception (g = 0.49) but not subject-matter-related knowledge [+W]
- Students producing high-quality revisions spent more time addressing higher order comments [+W]
Related Elements¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
element |
id |
peer-feedback |
title |
Peer Feedback |
description |
Peer feedback is the element in which learners respond to one another's work with comments intended to improve revision or performance. |
status |
review |
canonical |
True |
generated |
by codex/unspecified on 2026-04-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.