Claims

The freshman on-track indicator predicts five-year graduation equally or more strongly for students with learning disabilities, mild cognitive disabilities or emotional disturbances than for students without disabilities, with on-track students two to six times more likely to graduate

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2012: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On-track students with emotional disturbances are almost six times more likely to graduate in five years than off-track students with emotional disturbances, despite a lower overall graduation rate. → Julia Gwynne 2009 q2 i? Similar on-track graduation patterns hold for students with learning disabilities, students with mild cognitive disabilities, and students two or more years below grade level. → Julia Gwynne 2009 (2)

Evidence

Julia Gwynne 2009

Julia Gwynne, Joy Lesnick, Holly M. Hart, Elaine M. Allensworth. (2009). What Matters for Staying On-Track and Graduating in Chicago Public Schools: A Focus on Students with Disabilities. Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago Urban Education Institute. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/what-matters-staying-track-and-graduating-chicago-public-schools-focus-students

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Chapter 3 analysis of the 2001 CPS freshman cohort relating freshman on-track status to five-year graduation. Figure 11 prints on-track versus off-track graduation rates for each of five categories (no identified disability, two or more years below grade level, learning disability, mild cognitive disability, emotional disturbance), e.g. 87% versus 31% for students without disabilities. Students with speech/language or physical/sensory disabilities are not in this analysis, so the finding covers those three disability categories, not students with disabilities as a whole.

"although only 57 percent of on-track students with emotional disturbances graduate in five years (compared with 87 percent of students without disabilities), on-track students with emotional disturbances are almost six times more likely to graduate than off-track students with emotional disturbances."

Julia Gwynne 2009 (2)

Julia Gwynne, Joy Lesnick, Holly M. Hart, Elaine M. Allensworth. (2009). What Matters for Staying On-Track and Graduating in Chicago Public Schools: A Focus on Students with Disabilities. Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago Urban Education Institute. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/what-matters-staying-track-and-graduating-chicago-public-schools-focus-students

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Chapter 3 reports the on-track indicator is "equally or more predictive of graduation for students with disabilities" than in prior CCSR research, with Figure 11 showing on-track students across all groups two to six times more likely to graduate.

"Similar patterns exist for students with learning disabilities, students with mild cognitive disabilities, and students who enter high school two or more years below grade level, as shown in Figure 11."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id on-track-predicts-graduation-students-with-disabilities
title The freshman on-track indicator predicts five-year graduation equally or more strongly for students with learning disabilities, mild cognitive disabilities or emotional disturbances than for students without disabilities, with on-track students two to six times more likely to graduate
description The freshman on-track indicator predicts five-year graduation equally or more strongly for students with learning disabilities, mild cognitive disabilities or emotional disturbances than for students without disabilities, with on-track students two to six times more likely to graduate
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
source_checked 2026-10-20
recheck_by 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — julia-gwynne-2009, julia-gwynne-2009-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.